Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dent Hyg ; 96(5): 23-36, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224083

RESUMO

Purpose: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection in the United States and oral healthcare providers (OHPs) have become increasingly focused on preventing oral health outcomes related to HPV through screening for oral cancer and recommending HPV vaccination. The purpose of this study was to explore the comfort of having HPV-related discussions with OHPs among a college-age population.Methods: Students enrolled in an introductory-level, personal health class at a large, public, mid-Atlantic institution were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. Ten items related to participant's perceptions of HPV discussions with an OHP were part of a larger 100 item online survey designed to measure various aspects of college student health. Comfort with an OHPs' discussion of various health issues (including oral cancer, the relationship between oral cancer and HPV, and HPV vaccination) was measured on a 5-point scale with follow up, open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data; thematic coding was used to analyze the open-ended items.Results: A total of 3,236 students were invited to participate during the two data collection waves; 2,198 surveys were fully completed, representing a 67.9% response rate. Participants reported having the greatest level of comfort discussing oral health prevention behaviors such as tooth brushing and flossing and the least comfort discussing HPV-related topics with OHPs. Among those expressing low levels of comfort, qualitative responses highlighted participants limited knowledge related to HPV and the HPV vaccination along with the belief that these discussions were better suited for physicians.Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrated that college-age students may be uncomfortable with HPV-related discussions in a dental care setting. However, given the relationship between HPV infection and poor oral health outcomes, it is important that this population be informed about the oral-systemic HPV relationship and of the HPV vaccination as means for primary prevention. These findings highlight the need to address the public's perceptions regarding the role that OHPs play in educating the public about oral-systemic health.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Relações Dentista-Paciente , Neoplasias Bucais , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Bucais/prevenção & controle , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Am Coll Health ; : 1-9, 2022 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881772

RESUMO

This study assesses college students' intent to intervene when presented with a hypothetical peer exhibiting depression in one of three scenarios: depression, sadness, and depression in quarantine during COVID-19. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), variations in constructs associated with intent were examined by context (external triggers vs. no trigger), knowledge of, and experience with depression. One hundred and sixteen health sciences students read three vignettes and completed an enhanced TPB questionnaire. Intent to intervene was greater when the vignette target was experiencing depression with external stressors. Prior experience with depression and knowing someone with depression were associated with greater intent to connect the hypothetical peer to counseling resources regardless of vignette scenario. Due to increased mental health concerns resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts promoting awareness of mental illness in peers may benefit from increasing education about stressors and causes of depression that may not be observable.

3.
J Community Health ; 47(4): 697-703, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35585328

RESUMO

Student health insurance literacy is an area of limited prior knowledge, and investigations into this topic have the potential to impact students' self-care strategies, self-efficacy, decision-making, and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with health insurance literacy and knowledge among undergraduate students. In this study, undergraduate students at one mid-Atlantic public university in the United States who did and did not receive instruction on health insurance were surveyed. Students were recruited from a course that offers formal instruction about health insurance and students in a comparison group at the same university were recruited from a general education participant pool. Participants (n = 364) completed an online anonymous survey that included demographics, experience with health insurance, health insurance knowledge, and health insurance literacy self-efficacy. Hierarchical multiple regression results indicated participants in the course who received health insurance instruction scored higher on a measure of health insurance knowledge. Higher levels of health insurance self-efficacy was also associated with receiving instruction related to health insurance. Female gender and higher parental education were associated with a lower self-efficacy. Improving health insurance knowledge and self-efficacy among undergraduates is an important aspect of preparing students for post-graduate life where decisions about health insurance coverage and healthcare utilization will increase. Furthermore, increasing health insurance literacy may contribute to raising standards of health literacy, health care, and health care seeking across communities.


Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Estudantes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Universidades
4.
J Interpers Violence ; 36(19-20): NP10255-NP10275, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486341

RESUMO

Classification of sexual assault varies based on the characteristics of the victim, perpetrator, and event. However, most studies focus on the individual characteristics of participants asked to classify the assault, the victims' characteristics, or the event; few have examined variations in the perpetrator. Therefore, this study examined whether the occupation of the perpetrator affected the classification of the event as sexual assault. Participants included a primarily White female sample of undergraduate students (n = 401) at a south-Atlantic university. They completed a paper-and-pencil survey containing an ambiguous sexual assault encounter where the occupation of the perpetrator (athlete, reporter, college student, or politician) was randomly varied. Participants were asked to classify whether the encounter was sexual assault and what an appropriate punishment might be. Additional measures included the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (IRMA) and questions about personal experience with sexual assault. Overall, most participants labeled the encounter as sexual assault, indicating that college students are aware of the legal parameters for providing consent. However, this classification occurred differentially based on the occupation of the perpetrator. Participants were most likely to label the athlete as committing sexual assault, followed by the college student, politician, and reporter, respectively. Females and those who reject rape myths were more likely to label the scenario as sexual assault. A "personal apology" and a "sexual rehabilitation program" were the most common punishments selected for the perpetrator. These findings highlight potential concerns and the need for additional training when college students adjudicate sexual assault reports and determine appropriate consequences.


Assuntos
Vítimas de Crime , Estupro , Delitos Sexuais , Feminino , Humanos , Ocupações , Estudantes
5.
J Am Coll Health ; 65(1): 50-57, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661542

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the proportion of higher education institutions in the United States that require a personal health course (PHC) for graduation and to describe the nature of such requirements. Participants: This study included a random sample of public and private institutions of higher education (IHE) with undergraduate programs within the United States (N = 310). Data were collected between September 2014 and May 2015. METHODS: University catalogs were accessed from the institutions' public Web sites to determine whether a PHC was offered, and whether it was exclusively or optionally required for graduation. RESULTS: The majority (55.8%) of the sample offered at least 1 PHC, with only 10% exclusively requiring the course and an additional 10% optionally required the course. CONCLUSIONS: Although the utility of undergraduate students completing a PHC is clear, the majority of institutions do not require such a course for degree conferral.


Assuntos
Currículo/tendências , Educação em Saúde/normas , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Universidades/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA